Beard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts need exclude only reasonable hypotheses — not bare possibilities.... And questions of reasonableness are generally decided by the jury.”
• “To warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts need exclude only reasonable hypotheses - not bare possibilities. . . . And questions of reasonableness are generally decided by the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaskins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-12· cited 5×
• Kenerly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-22· cited 5×
• Demetria Gaskins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-12
• Kevin Russell Kenerly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-14· cited 58×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-11-02· cited 46×
• Daugherty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-21· cited 26×
• Shields v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-05-04· cited 22×
• Felder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-03· cited 15×
• Key v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-01-25· cited 10×
• State v. Fortner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-12-16· cited 1×