Beard v. Poydras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing National Historic Preservation Act claims as mooted by the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, but proceeding to determine other claims on the merits
• citing, e.g. , Pub. Employees for Envtl. Responsibility v. Hopper , 827 F.3d 1077 , 1087-88 (D.C. Cir. 2016)
• dismissing National Historic Preservation Act claims as mooted by the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, but proceeding to determine other claims on the merits
• \The specter of mootness raised in Standing Rock's earlier filings has now come to pass-construction is complete and oil is flowing through the pipeline.\
• “The specter of mootness raised in Standing Rock’s earlier filings has now come to pass—construction is complete and oil is flowing through the pipeline.”
• “The specter of mootness raised in Standing Rock’s earlier filings has now come to pass—construction is complete and oil is flowing through the pipeline.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).