Skip to main content
· 5/29/1968

Beard v. Pierson

Citations

  • 305 F. Supp. 134
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs not representative because of wide dispersion of class, and broad range of employment conditions and class interests
  • “[C]lass actions are a procedural device for promoting the economic and efficient disposition of justiciable controversies.”
  • certification decision cannot turn on whether representative’s claim is meritorious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daugherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.