Beard v. Klusmeier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• responding to plaintiff’s argument that employer’s response was not appropriate where harassing conduct continued after employer’s reprimand: “a post hoc rationalization sheds no light on whether [employer’s] response was ‘appropriate’ at the time”
• interpreting G. L. c. 151B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).