Skip to main content

Beard v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.

Citations

  • 41 A.3d 823
  • 615 Pa. 99
  • 2012 WL 1021323
  • 2012 Pa. LEXIS 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • meaningful risk-utility evaluation is effort to implement rational limits on strict liability in tort
  • meaningful risk-utility evaluation is effort to implement rational limits on strict liability in tort
  • acknowledging without criticism that the plaintiff brought a “product liability action” against a medical device manufacturer under “multiple theories of liability, including an asserted defective design” of the device
  • trial courts not restricted to considering single use of multi-use product in design defect, threshold, risk- utility balancing
  • trial courts not restricted to considering single use of multi-use product in design defect, threshold, risk-utility balancing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Beard v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.