Beard Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Thompson Plastics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• leaving open the possibility that privity is not required on an implied warranty claim where the remedy sought is not purely damages for economic loss
• the Supreme Court of Virginia has “referred to [§ 8.2-318] as modifying the common law privity rule”
• It is a general rule of statutory construction that “if one section addresses a subject in a general way and the other section speaks to a part of the same subject in a more specific manner, the latter prevails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).