Skip to main content
· 3/22/2002

Bear Medicine v. United States

Citations

  • 192 F. Supp. 2d 1053
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13122
  • 2002 WL 448983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a loss of consortium claim for parents of an adult child, reasoning that the Montana Supreme Court has “recognized repeatedly” its authority and responsibility for developing the common law
  • recognizing a loss of consortium claim for parents of an adult child, reasoning that the Montana Supreme Court has “recognized repeatedly” its authority and responsibility for developing the common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Molloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.