Bean v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the damage for trespass to property is the “variance in value of the property before and after the [trespass] . . . .”
• stating that damages for continuing trespass are typically measured based on “variance in value of the property before and after the injury”
• repair and restoration costs may be a proper measure of damages under Vermont law
• “If the injury is temporary in the sense that restoration can cure the harm, the reasonable cost of repair may serve the need and provide adequate and fair compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).