Bean v. Hubbard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing prejudice as the “only issue” before it, and “assum[ing]—without deciding” deficient performance
• “At trial, petitioner’s counsel did not object to certain testimony, and controlling case law at that time from the Court of Appeals held that such testimony was admissible.” (Emphasis added.)
• “[I]n evaluating the prejudice prong, we have one tremendous advantage: hindsight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).