Beam v. Beam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering official comment to UCCJEA § 202 that * jurisdiction attaches at commencement of proceeding to conclude that family court retained exclusive, continuing jurisdiction after parties moved away from state because modification proceeding was still pending
• considering official comment to UCCJEA § 202 that jurisdiction attaches at commencement of proceeding to conclude that family court retained exclusive, continuing jurisdiction after parties moved away from state because modification proceeding was still pending
• \The family court's jurisdiction did not automatically end once [the parents] and the [c]hildren moved out of state.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• and 15CA0203. DA Mountain Rentals, LLC v. The Lodge at Lionshead Phase III Condominium Association, Inc
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-10-06· cited 11×
• Plummer v. Plummer
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-01-22· cited 11×
• NB v. GA
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2014-05-23· cited 6×
• Matter of Montanez v. Tompkinson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-12-05
• DL v. CL
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-02-28
• C.T. v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2025-03-21
• In re: T.B.E. v. A.I.F.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2026-06-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-03-31· cited 121×
• Amantiad v. Odum
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 93×
• In Re Lewin
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-05-27· cited 33×
• State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Donna J.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-01-12· cited 20×