Beale's Adm'r v. Gordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “bare denials of statements allegedly made by patients” are not enough to defeat summary judgment on a due process claim
• noting that “conclusory statements, conjecture, or speculation by the party resisting the motion will not defeat summary judgment”
• finding physicians immune where plaintiff was not informed of the risks related to certain medications and was segregated for his own safety
• applying the professional judgment standard to an involuntarily committed patient's claim that hospital employees improperly medicated him and failed to monitor the effects of the medication
• applying the Youngberg standard to psychiatric treatment decisions made by the defendants as to an involuntarily committed patient
• “[C]onclusory statements, conjecture, or speculation by the party resisting the motion will not defeat summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).