S.D. Florida· 6/15/2007
Beale v. Biomet, Inc.
Citations
- 492 F. Supp. 2d 1360
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48181
- 2007 WL 1836696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- anticipating that the Florida Supreme Court would not adopt the DTC exception because, in the then-eight years since Perez, “no other state has followed suit”
- rejecting FDUTPA claim where “the literature makes clear those very things that Plaintiffs 10 || complain were deceiving.”
- collecting cases in which sales representatives “made the drug appear much safer than it actually was”
- finding plaintiffs had not presented any evidence to suggest physician “was influenced by Biomet in any fashion in his decisions to use the device in his patients” when, inter alia, physician testified (1
- discussing fact that in Salmon and Incollingo, “[t]he physicians prescribing the drug testified that they were influenced by the representations of the detail men, and prescribed the drug much more freely than they would have without those representations”
- applying the learned intermediary doctrine to medical devices
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alan S. Gold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Zimmer, Nexgen Knee Implant Prods. Liab. Ltd.Seventh Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 66×
- Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court· 2016-01-21· cited 54×
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 43×
- Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2015-03-30· cited 42×
- Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-14· cited 38×
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.D. New Mexico· 2008-08-22· cited 37×
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.D. New Mexico· 2019-03-29· cited 35×
- O'CONNELL v. Biomet, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 33×
- Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.S.D. West Virginia· 2014-07-08· cited 32×
- Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesS.D. Texas· 2012-03-06· cited 18×
- Crewe v. Rich Dad Education, LLCS.D. New York· 2012-08-03· cited 17×
- Metz v. Wyeth, LLCM.D. Florida· 2012-03-28· cited 14×
- Patteson v. Astrazeneca, LPDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-09· cited 7×
- Tyree v. Boston Scientific Corp.S.D. West Virginia· 2014-10-23· cited 6×
- Mendez Montes De Oca v. Adventis PharmaD. Puerto Rico· 2008-09-30· cited 3×
- Martha Luna v. P Atrium Medical CorporationD. New Hampshire· 2021-05-14· cited 1×
- Theodore Joas v. Zimmer, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2018-03-08
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1997-09-10· cited 1,016×
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 339×
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-25· cited 315×
- Rollins, Inc. v. ButlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-15· cited 284×
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court· 1973-03-14· cited 265×
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court· 1974-12-23· cited 231×
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesFifth Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 219×
- Edward Fritz v. Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New YorkEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-24· cited 180×
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1978-04-27· cited 139×
- Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-09· cited 118×
- Rollins, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-26· cited 110×
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-04-17· cited 106×
- Davis v. Powertel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 105×
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishEighth Circuit· 1967-01-05· cited 103×
- McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1982-06-01· cited 93×
- Samuels v. King Motor Co. of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-28· cited 91×
- Felix v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-02-23· cited 91×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.