Skip to main content
· 2/19/2004

Beale v. American National Lawyers Insurance Reciprocal

Citations

  • 843 A.2d 78
  • 379 Md. 643
  • 2004 Md. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding unrelated claims on behalf of children injured by lead exposure where the attorney/insured owed separate duties to each child
  • declining to apply another state’s law because the case proceeded in the trial court on the assumption that Maryland law applied and a petition for writ of certiorari was granted on that basis
  • declining to apply another state's law because the case proceeded in the trial court on the assumption that Maryland law applied and a petition for writ of certiorari was granted on that basis
  • attorney’s separate but simi- lar errors in representing five children in lead paint action were not ‘‘related . . . professional services’’ because he owed separate duties to each child and caused distinct damages as to each child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.