Beagel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding expert’s diagnosis of defendant’s medically-recognized psychiatric condition under the DSM was admissible
• psychiatrist should have been permitted to testify regarding defendant’s confabulation caused by psychogenic amnesia
• “In order for a person’s Miranda rights to be triggered, the statements must be the product of both custody and interrogation.”
• “In order for a person’s Miranda rights to be triggered, the statements must be the product of both custody and interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).