Beadling v. Sirotta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• scope of duty owed is not coextensive with duty owed to private patient seeking report as to status of health
• scope of duty owed is not coextensive with duty owed to private patient seeking report as to status of health
• scope of duty owed by a physician examining a person at the request of an employer is not coextensive with the duty that a physician owes to a private patient
• “Every [person] is in general bound to use care and skill in his conduct wherever the reasonably prudent person in his shoes would recognize unreasonable risk to others from failure to use such care.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• court did not reach the issue of employer liability
• court did not reach the issue of employer liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).