Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fact that client, not employer, controlled time, manner, and location of services to be performed weighed in favor of independent contractor status
• “[The] courts have utilized Section 753(l)(2)(B) to fill the void because its obvious purpose is to exclude independent contractors from coverage.”
• driver was free to complete assignment for client without supervision or monitoring by putative employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).