Skip to main content
· 6/30/1914

Beach v. City of Bellingham

Citations

  • 80 Wash. 287
  • 141 P. 703
  • 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1309

Syllabus

<p>Municipal Corporations—Impbovements—Pboceedings—Notice— Statute—Application. Provisions of a city charter of the first class with reference to the publication of notice of proposed improvements do not apply to proceedings under 3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 7892-1 et seq., in view of Id., § 7892-67 making the act applicable to all cities, and § 7892-71 providing that the act shall supersede the provisions of the charter of any city of the first class inconsistent therewith.</p> <p>Same — Assessments — Limitations •— Sepabate Impbovement. Where a resolution and ordinance for the clearing, grading and curbing of a certain street were within the statute as to the maximum cost, they are not' invalidated by the adoption, on the same day, of a resolution and ordinance for paving the same street, the combined cost of the two improvements exceeding the maximum cost allowed by law, where the later improvement was held illegal and the ordinance therefor subsequently repealed.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.