Bea v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is true that an ‘unexplained inconsistency’ in the employer’s proffered 15 justification is ‘evidence from which a jury could infer’ pretext.”
• all assuming arguendo that the plaintiff could establish a prima facie McDonnell Douglas case in affirming grants of summary judgment because plaintiff did not offer evidence of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).