New York Court of Appeals· 5/13/1999
BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg
Citations
- 712 N.E.2d 1220
- 93 N.Y.2d 382
- 690 N.Y.S.2d 854
- 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an employer may have a legitimate interest in protecting client relationships independent from its interest in an employee’s unique services
- deciding validity of a restrictive covenant on a motion for summary judgment
- articulating the “prevailing standard of reasonableness” applied by New York courts in determining the validity of non-competes and non- solicitation restrictions
- applying restrictive covenants to protect “against misappropriation of the employer’s trade secrets or of confidential customer lists, or protection from competition by a former employee whose services are unique or extraordinary”
- stating that the plaintiff did not have a reasonable interest in extending a restrictive covenant to “personal clients of defendant who came to the firm solely to avail themselves of his services and only as a result of his own independent recruitment efforts”
- noting 1 The parties agree that New York law governs the contract claims in this case and Texas law applies to BMC’s common law and statutory trade secrets claims. Dkt. 612 (joint pretrial order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 951×
- RELIABLE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. v. ArredondoIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 107×
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCS.D. New York· 2011-09-12· cited 76×
- Hall v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2017-12-19· cited 71×
- Beth Israel Medical Center v. Horizon Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.Second Circuit· 2006-05-19· cited 70×
- Beth Israel Medical Center v. Horizon Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of New Jersey, Inc.Second Circuit· 2006-05-19· cited 69×
- Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. EielsonS.D. Illinois· 2017-09-29· cited 57×
- Poller v. BioScrip, Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-09-25· cited 51×
- Morris v. Schroder Capital Management InternationalNew York Court of Appeals· 2006-11-21· cited 49×
- Paul M. Morris v. Schroder Capital Management International and Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., Docket No. 05-0823-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-04-18· cited 48×
- Estee Lauder Companies Inc. v. BatraS.D. New York· 2006-05-04· cited 48×
- Brown & Brown v. Theresa A. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals· 2015-06-11· cited 46×
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. A.P.T. Critical Systems, Inc.S.D. New York· 2004-06-24· cited 45×
- Friedman v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-11-01· cited 45×
- Crown IT Services, Inc. v. Koval-OlsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-10-12· cited 39×
- Barbagallo v. Marcum LLPE.D. New York· 2011-10-25· cited 37×
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Braspetro Oil Services CompanySecond Circuit· 2004-05-20· cited 36×
- Golden Krust Patties, Inc. v. BullockE.D. New York· 2013-07-16· cited 34×
- Trilegiant Corp. v. Sitel Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-11-15· cited 34×
- EarthWeb, Inc. v. SchlackS.D. New York· 1999-10-27· cited 33×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1974-03-27· cited 321×
- Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1977-02-24· cited 287×
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-07-13· cited 248×
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1977-10-18· cited 160×
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court· 1991-12-11· cited 114×
- Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals· 1971-02-25· cited 113×
- Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-18· cited 111×
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals· 1989-12-19· cited 104×
- Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court· 1982-04-02· cited 69×
- Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-12-01· cited 68×
- Foti v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-02-29· cited 65×
- Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-18· cited 61×
- Follmer, Rudzewicz & Co. v. KoscoMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-01-17· cited 52×
- Faw, Casson & Co. v. CranstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1977-06-14· cited 50×
- Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-03-13· cited 43×
- Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 42×
- City of Rye v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-07-10· cited 40×
- Knight, Vale & Gregory v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-16· cited 38×
- Perry v. MoranWashington Supreme Court· 1987-12-23· cited 36×
- Dobbins, DeGuire & Tucker, P.C. v. Rutherford, MacDonald & OlsonMontana Supreme Court· 1985-11-06· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.