Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Hiatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no definitive test for determining whether a change is beyond the scope of a particular contract.”
• “If the government succeeds in proving default, the plaintiff then must demonstrate ‘that the default was excusable under the terms of the contract.’”
• “[C]ourt[s] will avoid an interpretation that renders a portion of the contract useless, inexplicable, inoperative, void, insignificant, meaningless, superfluous, or achieves a weird and whimsical result.”
• for an extensive discussion of bad faith allegations by a government contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).