Skip to main content
· 10/29/1998

BD. OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING v. Carlson

Citations

  • 976 S.W.2d 934
  • 334 Ark. 614
  • 1998 Ark. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a party’s “failure to raise the due-process arguments before the Board [at the administrative hearing level] precludes its consideration by this court on appeal.”
  • holding that an administrative determination will not be set aside upon a ground not presented to the agency because to do so would deprive the agency of the opportunity to consider the matter, make its ruling, and state the reasons for its action
  • It is essential to a review under the Administrative Procedure Act that issues must be raised before the administrative agency appealed from or they will not be addressed by the appellate court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.