Skip to main content
· 5/28/1993

Bd. of Educ., Schumburg Community Consol. Sch. Dist. v. Educational Labor Rel. Bd.

Citations

  • 616 N.E.2d 1281
  • 247 Ill. App. 3d 439
  • 186 Ill. Dec. 649
  • 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2335
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court’s “sole function is to ascertain whether the findings of the [Commission] are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence”
  • reviewing court's \sole function is to ascertain whether the findings of the [Commission] are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence\
  • the employee’s evidence must go beyond inference of discrimination to establish “clear nexus” between impermissible factor and discharge
  • Commission’s decision is against manifest weight only when opposite conclusion is clearly evident from record
  • the employee's evidence must go beyond inference of discrimination to establish \clear nexus\ between impermissible factor and discharge
  • Commission's decision is against manifest weight only when opposite conclusion is clearly evident from record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.