Skip to main content
· 11/17/1989

B.C.E. Development, Inc. v. Smith

Citations

  • 215 Cal. App. 3d 1142
  • 264 Cal. Rptr. 55
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We conclude .. . that the talisman for enforcement is not the rigid requirement of retention of an interest in land, but rests instead upon a determination of the intention of those creating the covenant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froehlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.