· 11/17/1989
B.C.E. Development, Inc. v. Smith
Citations
- 215 Cal. App. 3d 1142
- 264 Cal. Rptr. 55
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We conclude .. . that the talisman for enforcement is not the rigid requirement of retention of an interest in land, but rests instead upon a determination of the intention of those creating the covenant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Froehlich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.