Skip to main content
· 6/11/2003

Bc v. Department of Child. and Families

Citations

  • 846 So. 2d 1273
  • 2003 WL 21348582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that father's alcohol and drug addictions did not support dependency adjudication when evidence failed to show that child suffered adverse consequences
  • holding that the record failed to support a finding of prospective abuse or neglect due to the father’s alcohol or drug use
  • concluding father's alcohol and drug addictions did not support dependency adjudication where evidence failed to show child suffered adverse consequences
  • stating that “[i]n order to support an adjudication of dependency, the parents’ harmful behavior must be a present threat to the child”
  • stating that “[i]n order to support an adjudication of dependency, the parents’ harmful behavior must be a present threat to the child”
  • stating that “[i]n order to support an adjudication of dependency, the parents’ harmful behavior must be a present threat to the child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.