Bbk Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that landlord’s invitation for plaintiff to exchange sex for rent was not actionable sexual harassment under Title VII
• recognizing that sexual harassment is an actionable sex discrimination claim under the FHA
• recognizing that sexual harassment is an actionable sex discrimination claim under the FHA
• holding conduct not severe because, among other things, defendant \did not touch an intimate body part\
• noting that harasser “did not touch an intimate body part”
• single incident did not rise to the level of a hostile environment; the harasser “did not touch an intimate body part” or threaten physical harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).