BBF, INC. v. Germanium Power Devices Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trial court was justified in concluding that third-party defendant who did not owe fiduciary duty to company could still be jointly and severally hable when non-fiduciary knowingly participated with fiduciary in appropriating corporate opportunity of company
• plaintiff did not produce evidence of the cost of training or finding replacements for fellow employees enticed away by the defendants
• no abuse of discretion in denial of motion to amend complaint to include prayers for relief under G.L.c. 93A
• plaintiff must establish that \harm had a reasonably ascertainable monetary value\
• not an abuse of discretion to require disloyal corporate officers to repay to corporation their entire salaries during period of disloyalty, where officers misused confidential corporate information to usurp a corporate opportunity
• “It was not sufficient simply to show [plaintiffs] projection of its sales and the historic return of total sales . . . plaintiff must establish that harm ‘had a reasonably ascertained monetary value’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).