BB v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a child victim’s out-of-court statements should have been excluded because “the immaturity that 22 rendered her incompetent at trial would have existed at the time of the interview as well”
• holding that a child victim’s out-of-court statements should have been excluded because “the immaturity that 22 rendered her incompetent at trial would have existed at the time of the interview as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).