Bazard v. Louisiana State Livestock Sanitary Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a foreclosure action does not include the procedural requirements of acting on that cause, and the “assertion that Act 91 imposes jurisdictional prerequisites on mortgage foreclosure actions is not supportable”
• stating that the test for whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is the competency of the court to determine controversies of the general class to which the case presented for consideration belongs
• holding “defective Act 91 notice does not implicate the jurisdiction of the court…[]”
• “our Courts of Common Pleas have unlimited original jurisdiction over all proceedings in this Commonwealth, unless otherwise provided by law”
• “The [foreclosure] action does not include the procedural requirements of acting on that cause. Appellee’s overarching assertion that Act 91 imposes jurisdictional prerequisites on mortgage foreclosure actions is not supportable.”
• “assertion that Act 91 imposes jurisdictional prerequisites on mortgage foreclosure actions is unsupportable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).