Baysinger v. Schmid Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that whether a reasonably prudent person should have undertaken a further investigation after two doctors told her they were unsure about the cause of her illness was a matter about which reasonable minds could differ making summary judgment inappropriate
• holding summary judgment was improper because the issue of whether a reasonably prudent person would have undertaken a more diligent investigation was “a matter about which reasonable minds could differ”
• plaintiff's mere suspicions concerning the cause of her infection were insufficient to commence limitations as a matter of law
• plaintiff's mere suspicions concerning the cause of her infection were insufficient to com-menee limitations as a matter of law
• suspicions plus investigation plus inconclusive medical opinions did not trigger accrual as a matter of law
• “That ultimate fact [of when the plaintiffs were on notice] is ordinarily a question for the trier of facts going to the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).