Bayron Rivera v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a continued detention would be justified by the fact of the driver’s nervousness and the lack of registration
• holding that officers’ continued detention of defendant and request to search defendant’s vehicle after determining that he was not an impaired driver did not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights
• holding that officers’ continued detention of defendant and request to search defendant’s vehicle after determining that he was not an impaired driver did not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights
• holding officers were “entitled to ask [] for permission to search” using a similar two-step questioning technique at the conclusion of a traffic stop
• holding officers were “entitled to ask [] for permission to search” using a similar two-step questioning technique at the conclusion of a traffic stop
• finding consent to search given following lawful traffic stop was voluntary where evidence showed that deputies did not show force or use threatening language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).