Baynum v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s contention that officers had a duty under Lolly/Deberry to create evidence of a cell phone call that occurred outside of when officers were questioning the victim
• “In Deberry this Court imposed a duty upon the State to preserve evidence which is material to a defendant’s guilt or innocence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baynum v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-05-29· cited 35×
• State v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-06-19
• State v. Baynum
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2018-04-16
• Rosser v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-10-28
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2020-01-22
• State v. Taylor
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-08-16
• Boulden v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2026-05-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Bailey v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-03· cited 118×
• Deberry v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-01-27· cited 112×
• Hammond v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-12-28· cited 91×
• Lolly v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-07-27· cited 76×
• Hendricks v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-04-21· cited 14×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-08-18· cited 13×