Bayly Crossing, LLC v. Consumer Protection Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he central dispute, therefore, involves not an interpretation, but ‘that last touch of selection’ (or discretion), which the agency had to exercise to make the statute meaningful and determinative in a particular case”
• “Interpreting the pure meaning of a statute is deemed a question of law ... however, we frequently give weight to an agency’s experience in interpretation of a statute that it administers.” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
• “To permit Petitioners, by motion, to ... argue the law regarding a question not raised in the petition for certiorari sanctions an end-around maneuver that we ... should not l’oster[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).