Baylor University Medical Center v. Rosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering motion to dismiss in which defendants “elaborated on the specific arguments” made in their timely objections to the expert reports
• declining to address whether deposition excerpts from treating physician satisfied statutory requirements of an expert report because reports from two other ex perts represented objective, good-faith effort to comply with requirements of chapter 74
• “The qualification of a witness as an expert is within the trial court’s discretion. We do not disturb the trial court’s discretion absent clear abuse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).