Bayless v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s discovery-based objection was not preserved because the defendant failed to obtain a ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGhee v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-02· cited 52×
• Foreman v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-27· cited 33×
• McWilliams v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-12-05· cited 22×
• Hubbard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-27· cited 4×
• Paul Vincent Fox v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2026-05-06

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doby v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-10-12· cited 93×
• State v. Earp
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-10· cited 74×
• Douglas v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 52×
• United States v. Mark Bradley Klinginsmith
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-06-17· cited 51×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
• Moffett v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-27· cited 22×
• State v. Allison
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1967-01-10· cited 19×
• State v. Brock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-08· cited 16×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-10-09· cited 15×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-07-01· cited 14×
• Laudan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-10-09· cited 11×
• Porter v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-06-13· cited 10×
• Lutz v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-04-06· cited 8×