Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The proof that Crabtree chose files with names clearly indicative of child pornography and clicked on these files to start their downloads demonstrated knowing possession.”
• “The original images that led to the thumbcache images were not found on [defendant’s] computer, though they had to have been there at one time.”
• “The mens rea requirements of KRS 531.355 are satisfied by showing that the defendant knew the videos were child pornography and that he knowingly possessed them.”
• “If the Commonwealth had attacked [the defendant’s] 21 truthfulness to undermine a statement he had made, or if he had taken the stand, then his character for truthfulness would be at issue and thus relevant and pertinent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).