Skip to main content
· 8/27/2002

Baych v. Herrick Douglass, Inc.

Citations

  • 227 F. Supp. 2d 620
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25199
  • 2002 WL 31268435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although three new defendants and new claims for fraud, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Uniform Transfers Act were added, the revival exception did not apply because the core of the lawsuit still arose from an alleged breach of employment contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.