Skip to main content
· 4/15/1820

Bayard v. Colefax

Citations

  • 2 F. Cas. 1060
  • 4 Wash. C. C. 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a conclusory opinion may furnish enough evidence of current disability or medical nexus so as to call for a VA medical examination
  • recognizing that 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (c)(4) presents a low threshold for the requirement of a VA examination
  • holding that a medical examination is necessary when the record (1) contains competent evidence that the claimant has a current disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of the disability; (2
  • holding that 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d)(2) requires that a medical opinion to be provided where the evidence indicates that a claim has merit but is insufficient to grant the claim
  • holding that 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d)(2) requires that a medical opinion to be provided where the evidence indicates that a claim has merit but is insufficient to grant the claim
  • holding that 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d)(2) requires that a medical opinion to be provided where the evidence indicates that a claim has merit but is insufficient to grant the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gton, Pennington, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.