Skip to main content
· 2/13/1989

Bay State-Spray & Provincetown Steamship, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Citations

  • 533 N.E.2d 1350
  • 404 Mass. 103
  • 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1415
  • 1989 Mass. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that action for lost profits and costs of repair concerning defective steamship engines was governed by U.C.C. statute of limitations rather than products liability limitations period
  • finding that action for lost profits and costs of repair concerning defective steamship engines was governed by U.C.C. statute of limitations rather than products liability limitations period
  • noting that section 2-318 parallels the tort statute of limitations
  • breach of implied warranty where malfunction of a ship’s engine resulted in lost profits and required repair costs
  • “[W]hen [contract-based] economic loss is the only damage claimed, recovery is not allowed in tort-based strict liability ... or in negligence.”
  • when economic loss is only damage claimed, recovery not allowed in tort-based strict liability or negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.