Skip to main content
· 3/30/1992

Bay State Milling Co. v. Martin (In Re Martin)

Citations

  • 142 B.R. 260
  • 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 724
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2431
  • 1992 WL 148317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that UFTA should not be applied remedially and that “it is by no means clear that the Illinois Supreme Court will adopt the view expressed in Cannon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jack B. Schmetterer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.