· 3/30/1992
Bay State Milling Co. v. Martin (In Re Martin)
Citations
- 142 B.R. 260
- 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 724
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2431
- 1992 WL 148317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that UFTA should not be applied remedially and that “it is by no means clear that the Illinois Supreme Court will adopt the view expressed in Cannon”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jack B. Schmetterer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.