Baxter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]efore the rules relating to the admissibility of extraneous offenses come into play, there must be some type of inadmissible evidence presented of the accused’s prior criminal conduct for error to be present.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• McKay v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-02· cited 356×
• Alexander v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 252×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-21· cited 199×
• Lopez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-08· cited 75×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 73×
• Turner v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1999-09-29· cited 73×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-18· cited 36×
• Tovar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-08-31· cited 29×
• Ramirez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-12-19· cited 28×
• Jimenez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-07-30· cited 17×
• Thornton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1994-12-30· cited 17×
• Cureton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-01· cited 15×
• Murphy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-11-21· cited 14×
• Green v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-11-06· cited 10×
• Grigsby v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-06· cited 8×
• Drew v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1986-10-16· cited 8×
• Davenport v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-03-21· cited 6×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-03· cited 5×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-06· cited 3×
• Helwig v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-10· cited 2×