Baxter, N. v. UCBR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[s]ubstantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support a conclusion”
• remanding the ALJ’s decision because the ALJ’s conclusory reasoning prevented the Court from determining if the decision was supported by substantial evidence
• remanding ALJ’s decision because the ALJ’s conclusory reasoning prevented the Court from determining if the decision was supported by substantial evidence
• Substantial evidence exists when a reasonable mind would accept the evidence as “adequate to support a conclusion.” (citations omitted)
• “[A]n ALJ’s failure to identify and analyze the appropriate listing, although error, may not by itself require reversal so long as the record otherwise supports the ALJ’s overall conclusion.”
• “The ALJ’s failure to identify and analyze the appropriate listing, although error, may not by itself require reversal so long as the record otherwise supports the ALJ’s overall conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).