Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Weeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that letter from CMS to pharmaceutical company was final agency action because “CMS stated its legal position firmly and finally”
• “Section 1395ii is inapplicable, however, when a plaintiff could not otherwise 9 obtain administrative review of its claims”
• “[American Chiropractic Ass’n v. Leavitt, 431 F.3d 812 (D.C. Cir. 2005)] does not require Baxter to recruit a physician or hospital to act as its proxy in an administrative process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig.
  S.D. California· 2018-02-27· cited 9×
• Empire Health Foundation v. Burwell
  District of Columbia· 2016-09-19· cited 4×
• District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. Sebelius
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-05
• Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hargan
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-24
• Stimlabs, LLC v. Becerra
  District of Columbia· 2022-10-21
• Row 1 Inc. v. Becerra
  District of Columbia· 2023-01-12