Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Weeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that letter from CMS to pharmaceutical company was final agency action because “CMS stated its legal position firmly and finally”
• “Section 1395ii is inapplicable, however, when a plaintiff could not otherwise 9 obtain administrative review of its claims”
• “[American Chiropractic Ass’n v. Leavitt, 431 F.3d 812 (D.C. Cir. 2005)] does not require Baxter to recruit a physician or hospital to act as its proxy in an administrative process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).