Skip to main content
· 3/9/1935

Baxter ex rel. Baxter v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 141 Kan. 527
  • 41 P.2d 999
  • 1935 Kan. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an affirmative statement of “no objection” waived evidentiary error
  • noting that while failure to object constitutes forfeiture, “affirmative approval constitute[s] a waiver”
  • the trial court properly assessed 10 points for OV 3 when the sexual assault victim received precautionary medical treatment
  • The “defendant’s statements that he knew who the victim was and that his ‘boys’ had been watching her were obvious threats” because “[a]ny person would interpret that as an implication that she or he could be found again in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch, Hutchison, Thiele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.