Baxst v. Levenson (In Re Goldberg)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting nonexclusive badges of fraud that a court may use in determining whether debtor acts with actual intent
• validating the 70% rule as “a useful guideline by which the bankruptcy court may evaluate the fairness of a transfer and the requirement of reasonably equivalent value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).