Skip to main content
· 3/12/1992

Baxley v. Sutter

Citations

  • 203 Ga. App. 579
  • 417 S.E.2d 205
  • 61 Fulton County D. Rep. 17
  • 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that prejudgment interest was discretionary on award of specific performance for breach of contract
  • indicating that prejudgment interest was discretionary on award of specific performance for breach of contract
  • finding that \[t]he Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the plaintiff prejudgment interest\ where the Supreme Court \directed specific performance of the contract\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.