Bavis v. UAL Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff’s claim was “simply not plausible” where it depended solely on an allegation of “temporal proximity of five months— a period of time that is not ‘very close’”
• “Section 1981 claims are not subject to the same exhaustion and timeliness requirements as those asserted pursuant to Title VII”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).