Skip to main content
· 8/3/2000

Baumgardner v. County of Cook

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 2d 1041
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 130
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11242
  • 2000 WL 1100438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that ADA’s “legislative history evidences an intent ... to supplement, not preempt, other federal and state laws protecting disabled individuals from discrimination”
  • “[T]he ADA incorporates by reference many of the definitions, powers, procedures, and remedies set forth in specified sections of Title VIL”
  • “When considering the rational relationship standard in conjunction with the standard for a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a confusing 47 Id. at 39:2–39:4. situation is presented.”
  • “[I]t was not the intent of Congress that individuals must lay down their constitutional rights to equal protection at the door of the courthouse when they file an ADA claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morton Denlow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.