Baumgardner v. Bimbo Food Bakeries Distribution, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a choice of law provision that read “[t]he validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed in accordance with the laws of New York” was sufficiently broad so as to cover the plaintiff’s contract, tort, and quasi-contract claims
• applying contractual choice- of-law provision to both tort and contract claims related to the contract
• applying contractual choice-of-law provision to both tort and contract claims related to the contract
• “And it is true that Rule 8 explicitly allows a party to plead inconsistent claims.”
• scope of New York choice-of-law provision pertaining to the “validity, interpretation and performance of the [ ] Agreement” included intentional interference with contract and unjust enrichment claims that were “very closely related” to the breach of contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).