Skip to main content
· 1/13/1993

Baumann v. Excel Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 845 P.2d 65
  • 17 Kan. App. 2d 807
  • 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • application of clear and convincing evidence standard at the summary judgment stage is unique to libel cases because First Amendment rights are at issue
  • when interpreting two statutes which appear to address similar subject matter, statutes should be read together and harmonized if possible
  • “the expert admitted he had not been ‘asked to address’ whether the useful safe life of the mower had expired”
  • explaining the scope of the legislation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Davis, Rulon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.