· 1/13/1993
Baumann v. Excel Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 845 P.2d 65
- 17 Kan. App. 2d 807
- 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- application of clear and convincing evidence standard at the summary judgment stage is unique to libel cases because First Amendment rights are at issue
- when interpreting two statutes which appear to address similar subject matter, statutes should be read together and harmonized if possible
- “the expert admitted he had not been ‘asked to address’ whether the useful safe life of the mower had expired”
- explaining the scope of the legislation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Davis, Rulon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.