Bauman v. Rayburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a property owner was merely an incidental third-party beneficiary of a contract between a general contractor and subcontractor because neither the contract nor anything else in the record clearly expressed an intent to primarily benefit the owner
• finding that a property owner was merely an incidental third party beneficiary of a contract between a general contractor and subcontractor because neither the contract nor anything else in the record clearly expressed an intent to primarily benefit the owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).